- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:54:09 +0100
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Jonathan Kew: > (But of course I also share Boris's bias!) I don’t, but I agree with both of you. It *could* pose problems in Java-/Ecma-Script and DOM for lazy or stupid authors, but that’s not good enough a reason to change CSS in a way that violates Unicode principles. Also, the number of people relying on a certain behavior for surrogate pairs, i.e. non-BMP characters, on the Web is probably still very low.
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 08:54:35 UTC