Re: [css3-text] Should text-shadow have 'spread'?

On 01/23/2012 07:41 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>
> Another option is to push a simplified L3 Text forward including the 2.0
> text-shadow and initiate an L4 with lots of new text-* features, including
> text-shadow extensions ?

Yes. That's what I'm thinking. Spread is not widely deployed yet, but
'text-shadow' without spread is, and should be documented as such.

~fantasai

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 07:18:50 UTC