- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:41:57 +0000
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Brian Manthos:] > [fantasai:] > > Also, the CSS2.0 version > > Well, if we're going to go back to the CSS2.0 version then this should be > restored as well... > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/text.html#text-shadow-props > # If no color is specified, the value of the 'color' property will be used > instead. > > > Further, if we want text-shadow and box-shadow to converge (where > reasonable) rather than diverge then box-shadow should be changed from... > # omitted colors are a UA-chosen color. > > > In short, both text-shadow and box-shadow should specify currentColor > style behavior for absent <color> parameters if we're concerned with CSS > 2.0 compatibility and want consistency for common parameters between box > and text shadow. I suspect the suggestion here is to align text-shadow with its original 2.0 incarnation, not to align box-shadow and text-shadow. Another option is to push a simplified L3 Text forward including the 2.0 text-shadow and initiate an L4 with lots of new text-* features, including text-shadow extensions ?
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 03:42:32 UTC