Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2012-01-23 (www-style@w3.org from January 2012)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:03:02 -0800
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDD3B40GCCFQfvS2g0ALSTX2p9=GzrpzYagUD_yirnybUg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>> This is, arguably, a fundamental issue with how background-position is treated rather than the <position> grammar itself.
>> Yes, that's the issue.  However, that behavior is intuitive and
>> useful.
>
> I think we'll just have to agree to disagree on this point.

Okay.  But more importantly, it's also the behavior of the property
since 2.1, and so can't be changed now.

~TJ

Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 22:04:07 UTC