RE: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec from Brian Manthos on 2012-01-23 (www-style@w3.org from January 2012)

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:47:48 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
Message-ID: <9710FCC2E88860489239BE0308AC5D170EB1A48E@TK5EX14MBXC264.redmond.corp.microsoft.>

>> This is, arguably, a fundamental issue with how background-position is treated rather than the <position> grammar itself.
> Yes, that's the issue.  However, that behavior is intuitive and
> useful.

I think we'll just have to agree to disagree on this point.

Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 21:48:45 UTC