Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2012-01-23 (www-style@w3.org from January 2012)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:39:40 -0800
To: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDrDAgc2xsLRLgx4zpX0O-PC+4oy83_N+V2vfMHMFd-pg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm not.  The fact that you can go from "left top" to "left 10px top
>> 10px" is nice; having to go from "bottom right" to "left calc(100% -10
>> px) top calc(100% - 10px)" would be pretty bad.
>
> Would supporting "calc(bottom - 10px) calc(right - 10px)" resolve your
> objection?  That seems clearer to me than "bottom 10px right 10px".

That's roughly the same in terms of complexity/badness.  :/

~TJ

Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 19:40:35 UTC