Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec from Aryeh Gregor on 2012-01-23 (www-style@w3.org from January 2012)

From: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:37:11 -0500
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
Message-ID: <CAKA+Ax=qHASsoE5uz6DSm-G1zpDvF9uu-fhUjOJTU=Su2yT1QA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not.  The fact that you can go from "left top" to "left 10px top
> 10px" is nice; having to go from "bottom right" to "left calc(100% -10
> px) top calc(100% - 10px)" would be pretty bad.

Would supporting "calc(bottom - 10px) calc(right - 10px)" resolve your
objection?  That seems clearer to me than "bottom 10px right 10px".

Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 19:38:02 UTC