- From: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:32:03 +0200
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 23/1/12 17:27, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:07:23 +0100, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 23/1/12 16:24, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >>> On 1/23/12 10:24 AM, Lea Verou wrote: >>>> What's the point of using a prefix on a spec that's in CR though? >>> >>> If your implementation doesn't match the draft? >>> >>> Or if websites use the prefixed version and you want compat with said >>> sites? >>> >>> -Boris >>> >> Ah, right. > > In this particular case, css3-marquee isn't really equivalent to WCSS > -wap-marquee. From what I can tell, the former seems tied to 'overflow', > whereas the latter is a special value for the 'display' property. There > is also a difference in how the element must be rendered when all > iterations have finished. > In any case, does it serve a purpose now? Isn't it completely subsumed by CSS animations? -- Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)
Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 15:32:45 UTC