- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:01:21 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Snook <jonathan@snook.ca>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:30 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Jonathan Snook <jonathan@snook.ca> wrote: >>> I'm concerned that a simple :transitioning pseudo wouldn't be enough - >>> it would trigger on *every* transition, but I suspect that decent uses >>> of it would actually want to trigger only on *certain* transitions. >>> Thus, I'd need to see some decent cases that would be helped by >>> something like this before I can really evaluate its usefulness. >> >> To address the fact that it triggers on every transition, an alternative syntax could allow for narrowing down the focus: >> >> div:transitioning(opacity) { } > > Yes, that was my first thought as well. I have no idea how useful it > is without use-cases, though. > > >> As to the two use cases I presented, you did present alternate options that would be just as sufficient in solving those problems. Seeing step-end for arbitrary values would be very helpful. >> >> I feel like there are other potential use cases but I'm not thinking of anything practical right now. > > If you come up with some, let us know! We *usually* only want to add > features when they give you an ability that is currently impossible, > or at least very confusing or unintuitive. How about this: http://m.snook.ca/archives/javascript/preparetransition-jquery-plugin
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2012 02:01:57 UTC