- From: Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:55:37 +0000
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMCRKiJ_qbXUyRJ0AVJXNoM8zMM6JV=f68H6tkpNCSoHFN8MoA@mail.gmail.com>
> > > Agh! I have just found this: > http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/weblog/2011/inside-csswg/ > > > > Why on earth is this not on the W3C pages as an introduction to the > list, and getting involved with it?! > > The hard part usually is that we have a tendency to say "Why was this not > accessible on the home page" but the we is composed of many people with > different priorities. > I'd be happy to get this sorted (i.e., do some stuff on the W3C's web-pages to help address these discoverability issues) if someone can point me to who I need to talk to about it :) That said, there is certainly room for improvements. > I remember in the past, I tried a small series of blog, but I didn't > manage to write everything I wanted. There is room for more comprehensive > information. > > http://www.w3.org/QA/2007/05/contribute-w3c-quick-tips.html > http://www.w3.org/QA/2007/06/contribute-w3c-tutorials.html > > Olivier Théreaux wrote also > http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/03/w3c-mailing-lists.html > Ah-ha! I'll investigate these when I am not at work. Thanks. > btw I didn't remember where it was so I just did > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22How%20to%20to%20contribute%20to%20W3C%22 > That's cool, but it really shouldn't be necessary to use Google to navigate the W3C...
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2012 15:56:16 UTC