- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:36:51 -0800
- To: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl> wrote: > On 01-13 23:27, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Since everything currently uses sRGB, gradients should match that and >> stay how they are. > > I disagree. As you said, everything is sRGB, but doing linear gradients > in way they are currently done, are incorrect usage of sRGB. sRGB is > only usefull for transfering pixels colors, not performing ANY > operations on them other than displaying on devices using same color > space. Any operation like resampling, rescaling, generating gradients, > performing blending, performing any kind interpolation based on > position, time, or other parameters must be done in linear space to > produce correct sRGB result. > > This just means that CSS is not using sRGB, but mix of sRGB and RGB, > often interchanging them without doing proper conversion. I agree that it's wrong. However, it's better for everything to be wrong in a consistent way (which can be fixed later) than for things to be inconsistent, with some things working correctly and others incorrectly. SVG *already has* a way to fix this, via the 'color-interpolation' property: <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/painting.html#ColorInterpolationProperties>. SVG gradients pay attention to it, and it defaults to sRGB. At some point we should pull it into general CSS so that it applies to CSS gradients as well I won't be making this change - CSS gradients should be consistent with SVG gradients, CSS Transitions/Animations (and, I suspect, SVG animations as well, though I haven't tested it), and other things. SVG has a way to indicate that all of its things should use linearRGB instead, and CSS should adopt that in the future, but I don't want to add it to Image Values level 3. It should be considered for either Image Values 4 or Colors 4. Please indicate whether or not this resolution is acceptable. ~TJ
Received on Sunday, 15 January 2012 00:38:08 UTC