- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:58:59 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/10/2012 04:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jon Rimmer<jon.rimmer@gmail.com> wrote: >> Leaving aside the actual problem at hand, this thread is an example of >> the slightly frustrating nature of providing feedback and suggestions >> to the WG. >> >> Matt has a use-case/problem which the extant mechanisms within CSS are >> not capable of resolving. I made a couple of suggested changes in the >> thread that might help with it. But since neither of us is a member of >> the WG, how can we proceed? We can't raise issues in the tracker, and >> we can't edit the wiki, so we have no way to ensure the problem and >> ideas don't get lost in the mix. >> >> That lack of a structured mechanism for non-members to submit and >> track feedback is something that gives the WG the feel of a vendors' >> club sometimes. > > We are somewhat unorganized in this respect. ;_; We're trying to do better! > > The spec editors generally handle logging bugs. We have several > methods - using Tracker, using Bugzilla, or tracking them inline in > the spec. > > In this case, the relevant spec is Text, which makes the relevant spec > editor Fantasai. She'll get to this - this email thread is only a day > old. font-size-adjust is in CSS3 Fonts, actually. But it's not a simple issue, it's a "here I have a problem" and there are multiple ways of *trying* to solve it; we have no idea which one, or what combination, will actually be the right solution. So far we've had suggestions for - font-size-adjust additions - text-justify additions - @supports additions - layout additions It's not well-defined enough to be a spec issue--it's merely an "unsolved use case" and we don't have anything set up to track such things. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 07:59:30 UTC