On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jon Rimmer <jon.rimmer@gmail.com> wrote: > Leaving aside the actual problem at hand, this thread is an example of > the slightly frustrating nature of providing feedback and suggestions > to the WG. > > Matt has a use-case/problem which the extant mechanisms within CSS are > not capable of resolving. I made a couple of suggested changes in the > thread that might help with it. But since neither of us is a member of > the WG, how can we proceed? We can't raise issues in the tracker, and > we can't edit the wiki, so we have no way to ensure the problem and > ideas don't get lost in the mix. > > That lack of a structured mechanism for non-members to submit and > track feedback is something that gives the WG the feel of a vendors' > club sometimes. We are somewhat unorganized in this respect. ;_; We're trying to do better! The spec editors generally handle logging bugs. We have several methods - using Tracker, using Bugzilla, or tracking them inline in the spec. In this case, the relevant spec is Text, which makes the relevant spec editor Fantasai. She'll get to this - this email thread is only a day old. Aaaaand it looks like she's just ninja'd me. Well, I'll send this email anyway. ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 00:30:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:09 UTC