- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:21:27 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/09/2012 02:39 PM, Ambrose LI wrote: > 2012/1/7 fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>: >> I can see a logical argument for >> * allowing any of the points where a space existed to be a wrap point, or >> * saying that when a breakable space collapses with a non-breakable one, >> the collapsed space is breakable. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> I'll note Firefox and Opera seem to wrap right before B, even if I forbid >> it: >> <p><nowrap>A</nowrap> <em> </em> <nowrap><em> </em> B</nowrap> >> (WebKit just refuses to render the empty inlines.) > > If a non-breakable space collapses with a breakable one, shouldn’t the > space that remains be non-breakable? No. See the first part of the discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0408.html That first example must have a breakpoint after the nbsp. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 01:22:00 UTC