- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:46:36 -0500
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I've been reviewing the white space collapsing section and ran into an issue.
# When wrapping, line breaking opportunities are determined based
# on the text prior to the white space collapsing steps above.
We added this sentence in this thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Dec/0075.html
The intention was to capture that
<p><nowrap>A </nowrap> B</p>
is allowed to wrap, even though the preserved space is the non-wrappable one.
But, it's unclear what happens when you have this:
<style>
p { border: solid; width: 1em; }
em { border: double orange; }
</style>
<p><nowrap>A </nowrap> <em> </em> <em> </em> B
Wrapping aside, this creates A, followed by a space, followed by two
empty orange borders, followed by B. Where's the wrap point wrt the
orange boxes?
I can see a logical argument for
* allowing any of the points where a space existed to be a wrap point, or
* saying that when a breakable space collapses with a non-breakable one,
the collapsed space is breakable.
Thoughts?
I'll note Firefox and Opera seem to wrap right before B, even if I forbid it:
<p><nowrap>A </nowrap> <em> </em> <nowrap><em> </em> B</nowrap>
(WebKit just refuses to render the empty inlines.)
~fantasai
Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 21:50:57 UTC