- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:11:02 -0800
- To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- CC: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Tony Chang <tony@chromium.org>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/05/2012 04:48 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: > I don't see a problem with just having the flex(1 0 10px) == 10px when > not in a flexbox. It doesn't seem weird to me. Sure, but it's weirder / less intuitive when preferred width is omitted from the flex() function -- then it computes to 0px and won't render at all, since 0px is the default preferred width in flex(). So e.g. "width: flex(5)" would be equivalent to "width: 0px", in non-flexbox contexts.
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 07:11:39 UTC