- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:28:57 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
On 30/11/2011 11:36, Simon Sapin wrote: > Section 10.8 of CSS 2.1 states that the line-height property defines the > minimal height for every line box. However, the ninth paragraph of > section 9.4.2 states that empty line boxes are to be treated as > zero-height or non existent. > > Both statements seem to be contradictory. I think that the exception of > empty line boxes (with "empty" as defined in 9.4.2) should be mentioned > in 10.8. Hi Simon, This sentence in 9.4.2 is notorious! However, crucially, it says that that certain line boxes are to be treated as zero-height for an explicitly-specified calculation, and as non-existent for all other purposes. If the line box is non-existent then there is no height, so I don't think the two statements are contradictory. One could argue that the statement in 9.4.2 belongs in 10.8, but to be honest there are a number of places at which the spec could be rearranged but I don't think there's much value in doing so at this stage of its life cycle. Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2012 22:29:29 UTC