- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:40:35 -0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 2/23/2012 8:47 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >>> This specific proposal has been discussed several times on the list - >>> > > every time there is a vendor prefix discussion, really - and no >>> > > consensus in its >> > >> > David's proposal was the best compromise I've seen in the entire >> > discussion. It's new, it popped up recently, and I didn't see anything in >> > the way of objections. > I can't tell what's new about it. Having one prefix such as -w3c- or draft > has been discussed a few times [1]. > > [1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Mar/0317.html > The only bit of information I see in that thread that's truly important is that RoC would veto it. There's no point in anyone in webkit floating a shared prefix with Mozilla if one of their lead developers will veto. Given that, I'm dropping this thread, and continuing on with the -webkit- tag soup. We're facing greater fragmentation anyway. But at least the browsers have a lot more feature, and CSS implementation has come a long way. -Charles
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 05:41:00 UTC