- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:33:38 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:09 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 02/18/2012 01:57 AM, Phil Cupp wrote: >> >> This is a good idea. I like your first option (grid-position-*) over >> grid-template-* since you don't need a template to define a grid. I'll put >> an issue on the grid spec wiki [1] to make a change. > > I'll just note, the disadvantage of it is that the positioning properties > are > likely to be used much more often, and thus making them the longer ones is > poor > optimization for typing things out. Yes, I'm not a fan of grid-position-* because of its length and prevalence. I didn't like the row/rows distinction either, though. We should put some effort into either coming up with a new short name for grid-row/column, or a new name for grid-rows/columns (used less often, so slightly less important to have the name be short). ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 23:34:25 UTC