- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:31:16 -0800
- To: Phil Cupp <pcupp@microsoft.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Phil Cupp <pcupp@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Overall the interaction with the 'position' property probably needs some thought. > > [pcupp] There's nothing in the spec to suggest that positioned children or descendants get special treatment so you won't find these rules written anywhere currently. Do you think they need to be? I do see the flexbox editors have added something about it to their spec since I last read through it so maybe so. Let me know what you think. It was important for Flexbox because (1) abspos elements become 'block', which would have interfered with flexbox-item wrapping if it wasn't otherwise specified, and (2) the static position was non-obvious. (1) doesn't apply to Grid, but for (2) it would be useful to have an explicit statement that the placeholder is still affected by the grid properties. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 23:32:03 UTC