- From: Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:42:09 -0800
- To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANyEp6WXD=e0DOr3X8gxMCm9CtaxwaCRkngUPEEKWhduemB54Q@mail.gmail.com>
>From a RHS perspective, I can tell you that in 2+ years of allowing $ as a value in stylesheets in Sass, it has not posed a single syntactic conflict for our users. Chris On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net> wrote: > Seems like you're blowing things a bit out of proportion here. Actually, > by keeping variables in a new namespace, you diminish the expected amount > of review and impact. As things stand, by conflating the syntax with > properties, we should be _more_ concerned that we are introducing a > conflict. > > Chris > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Arron Eicholz < > Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> On Friday, February 17, 2012 2:43 PM Chris Eppstein wrote: >> >Variables are a new primitive. Seems justified. >> >> Altering the core grammar takes a great deal of investigation. An >> alteration to the core grammar requires us to analyze all 400+ existing, >> proposed and suggested properties, including SVG properties, (there are >> actually 606 by my last count, but who is keeping track). We must determine >> if any of them have to be updated, altered or changed to account for this >> new primitive. Don't forget to multiply all the values that all those >> properties take and how they will be affected. This is an extensive amount >> of work and who knows what we might miss when looking at all the values >> that those properties take. >> >> Now take into account the OM and Javascript side of things and even how >> frameworks interact. Will a '$' interfere or makes things confusing? My >> guess is it will, at the very least it will make things confusing. It also >> wouldn't shock me if it broke a Javascript library somewhere. >> >> In the end the cost is very high for changing the core grammar. Going >> with 'data-' or 'var-' really doesn't have much impact in this regard and >> would be the best solution to move things quickly. >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Arron Eicholz >> >> >> > >> >On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net> >> wrote: >> >> What's wrong with using $? >> >> >> >> :root { $accentColor: green; } >> >> h1 { color: $accentColor; } >> >It violates the Core Grammar, unfortunately. That doesn't make it >> >impossible to do, it just means we need a pretty good justification >> >for it. >> >> >
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 23:42:40 UTC