- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:09:53 -0800
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDC=H4=WHZ70ts4GSSUumV3xQ2oWuZghm=2WF+h5jOrZjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dirk, just to make it clear to me. The issue you are trying to resolve is if you have content that is like: <HTML> ... <svg> ... <g id='id' transform="rotate(45, 10, 10)"> and you call: getcomputedStyle(document.getElementById("id")).transform it should return: "rotate(45deg, 10px, 10px)" On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry, that I missed this threat. This is in discussion on the thread > with the tittle: [css3-transforms] translate() vs. translate3d() [1] > > I tried to describe the benefits for CSS[2] but more necessary the > requirements for SVG [3]. This is the last blocking issue for compliance > between CSS Transforms and SVG Transforms for transformation functions. > That is the reason why I think it is necessary to leave it in. Like I wrote > before, it doesn't break existing content. These are just two more optional > arguments, and it is easy to implement. It is already done for the SVG > implementation on all browser anyway. So SVG authors would expect that it > works on CSS as well, beside that if it is not supported we would break > existing SVG content. And for SVG a rotate with three arguments is used a > lot! > > Greetings, > Dirk > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0488.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0513.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0521.html > > On Feb 15, 2012, at 11:37 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > > > On Wednesday 2012-02-15 11:27 -0800, Rik Cabanier wrote: > >> recently you added the 3 parameter version of rotate to the transform > spec: > >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/#two-d-transform-functions > > > > I'd rather see this removed; I think we should try to advance the > > current (widely-implemented) feature set rather than add more > > features to this level of the specification. > > > > -David > > > > -- > > 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 > > 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 21:10:28 UTC