- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:30:55 +0100
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/14/2012 08:26 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > ± From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] > ± Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:10 AM > ± > ± The Grid Layout spec implicitly defines 'start' and 'end' as the first and last lines of the > ± grid, respectively. While this might make sense for grid columns, it conflicts with our > ± logical naming scheme when applied to grid rows. Therefore, if such keywords are needed, I > ± suggest using 'first' and 'last' (as used by one of the examples for explicitly-named > ± lines). > > Are there other places where "first" and "last" are used with similar meaning? > > Renaming for consistency elsewhere would be a good reason. > > Renaming because there is something wrong with grid having symmetrical model in 2 dimensions seems questionable. We have chosen to use start/end for 'flex-align' *because* it is what grid is using - with same motivation. Why would we suddenly become shy of naming grid lines to match alignment directions?? The convention is before start + end after Why aren't we using that convention? ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 19:31:29 UTC