- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:10 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
± From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] ± Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:10 AM ± ± The Grid Layout spec implicitly defines 'start' and 'end' as the first and last lines of the ± grid, respectively. While this might make sense for grid columns, it conflicts with our ± logical naming scheme when applied to grid rows. Therefore, if such keywords are needed, I ± suggest using 'first' and 'last' (as used by one of the examples for explicitly-named ± lines). Are there other places where "first" and "last" are used with similar meaning? Renaming for consistency elsewhere would be a good reason. Renaming because there is something wrong with grid having symmetrical model in 2 dimensions seems questionable. We have chosen to use start/end for 'flex-align' *because* it is what grid is using - with same motivation. Why would we suddenly become shy of naming grid lines to match alignment directions??
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 19:26:57 UTC