Re: WG consensus on lobbying WG members that they are taking the wrong way?

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?post/2012/02/09/CALL-FOR-ACTION%3A-THE-OPEN-WEB-NEEDS-YOU-NOW
> says:
>
> "The following article is written by Daniel Glazman, co-chairman of
> the CSS Working Group, but also represents an official discussion of
> the CSS Working Group and was decided by consensus in the Group.
> Members of the Group behind that decision include Adobe, Apple,
> Disruptive Innovations, Google, HP, Microsoft, Mozilla, Opera and the
> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)."
>
> and
>
> "Let Microsoft, Mozilla and Opera know this is the wrong way to go"
>
> >From the POV of someone outside the meeting, this looks strange. How
> come Microsoft, Mozilla and Opera were part of a consensus to ask
> people to lobby them that they are taking the wrong way?

We (Google) were also not part of any such consensus.  Daniel, please
either clarify that statement or remove Google from your post.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 10:06:39 UTC