WG consensus on lobbying WG members that they are taking the wrong way?

http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?post/2012/02/09/CALL-FOR-ACTION%3A-THE-OPEN-WEB-NEEDS-YOU-NOW
says:

"The following article is written by Daniel Glazman, co-chairman of
the CSS Working Group, but also represents an official discussion of
the CSS Working Group and was decided by consensus in the Group.
Members of the Group behind that decision include Adobe, Apple,
Disruptive Innovations, Google, HP, Microsoft, Mozilla, Opera and the
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)."

and

"Let Microsoft, Mozilla and Opera know this is the wrong way to go"

>From the POV of someone outside the meeting, this looks strange. How
come Microsoft, Mozilla and Opera were part of a consensus to ask
people to lobby them that they are taking the wrong way?

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 09:36:59 UTC