On 4/2/12 12:19, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Lea Verou<leaverou@gmail.com> wrote: > While comma separation would probably be appropriate, it's not > necessary for disambiguation here (unlike all the other examples > you've provided). My point was that it's necessary for consistency, not disambiguation. > We should probably have an origin() transform or something that > affects all following transforms up to the next origin(). I see three problems with this: - More verbose for the average case (although depends on the statistics, I can only estimate) - Can't be partially overridden. - Inconsistent with how other properties work Admittedly not serious issues, but what's the benefit? -- Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)Received on Saturday, 4 February 2012 13:13:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:11 UTC