- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 02:19:42 -0800
- To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> wrote: > We were discussing today with shepazu that there doesn't seem to be any > reason for transform to be whitespace separated over comma separated, like > other list-accepting properties (background, box-shadow, text-shadow, > transition etc). It probably comes from SVG transforms, which are also > whitespace separated, but it's inconsistent with the rest of CSS. While comma separation would probably be appropriate, it's not necessary for disambiguation here (unlike all the other examples you've provided). > While I'm at it, it would be great if transform-origin was also a comma > separated list, being potentially able to accept different origins for every > transform. As it currently stands, the only way to do that is wrapper > elements. It's very useful, for example to make an element move in a > circular path while not being rotated itself (two rotate transforms with > different origins and opposite angles). We should probably have an origin() transform or something that affects all following transforms up to the next origin(). ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2012 10:20:37 UTC