RE: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec

> minus size of background image
This part is the problem, as was discussed in depth in the previous discussion.

-----Original Message-----
From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] 
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:27 AM
To: www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec

On 01/24/2012 08:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
> 'background-position' is the one and only context in CSS 2.1 (and, as
> far as I know,<position>  in general is the only context in all of
> CSS) where percentages are treated different than an equivalent
> length.

http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#background-position

   # Percentages:  refer to size of background positioning area minus size
   #               of background image; see text

I'm not seeing your problem.

~fantasai