Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec from fantasai on 2012-02-02 (www-style@w3.org from February 2012)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:26:39 -0800
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <4F2AB93F.8030601@inkedblade.net>

On 01/24/2012 08:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
> 'background-position' is the one and only context in CSS 2.1 (and, as
> far as I know,<position>  in general is the only context in all of
> CSS) where percentages are treated different than an equivalent
> length.

http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#background-position
   # Percentages:  refer to size of background positioning area minus size
   #               of background image; see text

I'm not seeing your problem.

~fantasai

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 20:02:40 UTC