- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:48:34 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Boris: > But that has nothing to do with length and item() behavior, a priori. > There are plenty of other cases where a property exists but is not > reflected in length/item (e.g all nodelists have such properties, JS > arrays have properties not reflected in the length, etc). I have to think about this some more. My gut reaction is that I think it's weird to have valid .propertyName count > item() count. Example A (CSS 3) box-shadow: 1px 2px 3px 4px red; Example B (CSS 7) box-shadow-x: 1px; box-shadow-y: 2px; box-shadow-b: 3px; box-shadow-s: 4px; box-shadow-c: red; --- Brian's description: Available by name: A boxShadow B boxShadow, boxShadowX, boxShadowY, boxShadowB, boxShadowS, boxShadowC Available by item(): A boxShadow B boxShadow, boxShadowX, boxShadowY, boxShadowB, boxShadowS, boxShadowC Length: A 1 B 6 (gain 5) --- Boris's proposal: Available by name: A boxShadow B boxShadow, boxShadowX, boxShadowY, boxShadowB, boxShadowS, boxShadowC Available by item(): A boxShadow B boxShadowX, boxShadowY, boxShadowB, boxShadowS, boxShadowC Length: A 1 B 5 (gain 5, lose 1)
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 22:49:21 UTC