- From: Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:13:50 +0000
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 12:14:28 UTC
I think fragmenting the list will only lead to more discoverability and feedback problems, as well as making management and general overviews harder and more time consuming. As noted, the Forum thread took a large proportion of that message count, and it's a one-time topic that's essentially been resolved as "no action" (excepting some surrounding issues that got discussed in there which may have some action taken when people can spare time). -Matt On 1 February 2012 11:39, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: > > Le 1 févr. 2012 à 06:24, Daniel Glazman a écrit : > > end up with four times more traffic to read and digest. > > probably. > We may try as a group to label the mails, though such efforts in large > open (and changing) community is usually doom to fail. > > For example in Web Apps Mailing list, people use more or less successfully > things like [File API], [XHR], etc. before the real object of the mail. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/subject.html > > -- > Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ > Developer Relations, Opera Software > > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 12:14:28 UTC