- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 22:27:53 +0000
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, "florianr@opera.com" <florianr@opera.com>
On Dec 22, 2012, at 22:37, "Florian Rivoal" <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:34:25 +0100, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote: > >>> I don't mind adding support for portrait-primary, etc, but if we add >>> that they should be supported by the (orientation: *) media features as >>> well. >> >> Florian, do you think we could add those to CSS Media Queries >> orientation values? > > No objection to considering it, but I am not sure I understand how the value would be used. How would you expect layouts to differ when the MQ is portrait-primary vs portrait-secondary? Use cases would be welcome. Has providing a JavaScript API to the CSS adaptation been considered? If so, isn't the Screen orientation API redundant? --tobie
Received on Saturday, 22 December 2012 22:28:32 UTC