- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:56:17 +0100
- To: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/12/12 02:18, Rossen Atanassov wrote:
> The idea of being able to re-position a shape was considered before and what we agreed at the time was to introduce a shape-transform. What is this needed and/or different than css transforms - simply because it has to affect layout (as the shape moves there must be a reflow around it etc.).
>
> We also agreed that this is not something we want to take for the current version of the spec, thus I'm not sure why these changes are needed now.
Why ? This is simple, Rossen ; see this:
#foo {
float: right;
width: 400px;
height: 350px;
shape-outside: url(foo.png) /* a 100x150px image */
}
Where is placed the exclusion in #foo's box ? Centered ? Cornered?
</Daniel>
Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 13:56:43 UTC