W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Ambiguities in fill:url() / stroke:url() syntax

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 18:20:54 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLazrzdvGs-JNoCW3myQDijD_JuR=NWKrc8dPq3tp4k31A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com>, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:

> Here a short example. On a CSS Image value, we would always interpret:
>         url(file#frag)
> as a reference of a SVG resource (like SVG Paint Server, Masker, Clipper,
> Filter or Marker) and
>         url(file)

> as an image.

Ah right. That is a reasonable approach except for breaking SVG Stacks.

The important thing is that we make a decision and stick with it.

Jesus called them together and said, “You know that the rulers of the
Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority
over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among
you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your
slave — just
as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his
life as a ransom for many.” [Matthew 20:25-28]
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 05:28:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:24 UTC