- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:13:14 -0800
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Cc: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, Rudolph Gottesheim <r.gottesheim@loot.at>, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com> wrote: > (12/10/10 1:50), Ojan Vafai wrote: >> If you make the flexitems themselves also be flexboxes, then you can get >> the desired layout: http://jsfiddle.net/GgzGf/3/ >> >> I'll note this as an issue for either the next level of Flexbox or Sizing. > > It does work in both Opera Next and Chrome Canary, but I am not exactly > sure why it should per spec. > > > This is what I think: > > # 8. Calculate the cross size of each flex line. > # > # If the flex container has only a single line (even if it's a > # multi-line flex container), the cross size of the flex line is the > # flex container's inner cross size. > # > # Otherwise, for each flex line: > # ... > > For a normal 'flex-flow: row' flex container with 'height: auto', you > can't really get the cross size of the flex line from the flex > container's inner cross size so I had assumed this step is actually saying > > A. > > | If the flex container has only a single line (even if it's a > | multi-line flex container) and a definite cross size, ... Correct, we'd accidentally left a hole in that step. I've corrected it with your suggested text. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 22:14:04 UTC