- From: Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:52:20 +0000
- To: Behrang Saeedzadeh <behrangsa@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C CSS Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 11:52:51 UTC
If you need a shadow that's smaller, negative spread would do it. If you're just looking for a gradient on one edge, use CSS3 gradients on ::before/after. Is there an effect that you're looking for that can't be achieved by either of those things? Jake. On 3 December 2012 00:31, Behrang Saeedzadeh <behrangsa@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Right now box-shadow's syntax does not provide a way for specifying > shadows only for top and bottom of an element. The only way of achieving > this is using some clever hacks like the one here: > http://stackoverflow.com/a/10150898/1736621 > > This in turn leads to drop shadows that are brighter than what is expected. > > I think apart from box-shadow, we also need box-shadow-top, > box-shadow-right, box-shadow-bottom, and box-shadow-left. > > What do you think? > > Please see the attached example. > > Selection_012.png<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByWstmU-AS9GNURTUkVMdWdWdzQ/edit> > > > Cheers, > Behrang Saeedzadeh > http://www.behrang.org >
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 11:52:51 UTC