- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:46:52 -0700
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: "Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com" <mtanalin@yandex.ru>, CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:34 AM, François REMY
<fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> | html { font-size: .0625em; }
> | /* set the rem to one "responsive pixel" to 1px */
>
> |
> | body { font-size: 16rem; }
> | /* Set the base font size back to the user's default. */
>
> Thanks for the workaround. However, I'm under the impression we introduced
> 'dppx' for less than this.
>
> The proposed workaround is nice, but still seems like a hack to me; while I
> understand we don't feel the pressure to add 'rpx', but it would be a nice
> addition anyway.
Yeah, I agree - I was just pointing out that it's relatively easy to
hack around for now. ^_^
I'll add it as an issue for Values 4.
~TJ
Received on Friday, 31 August 2012 18:47:42 UTC