- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:05:22 +1000
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: CSS 3 W3C Group <www-style@w3.org>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
CC Brad Kemper since this is much like rotate background tile. On 31/08/2012 12:49 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: > >> That good. Leads to less abuse of element() but it would be nice to be >> able to rotate backgrounds. Just saying......... >> > > Sure. You can have element() point to a container element with a > transformed child to get the effect. > > Rob Why does this have to be a transformed child of a container? I am now getting lost in what is allowed and what should not be allowed. Here is a demo [1] of one of Brad's gradient demos [2] which can not be done by 'rotate background tile' since 'rotate background tile' is not in the spec. In this example, element() point to a container element. This is the same with my recent demo [3]. To be able to do any of the above would be greatly welcomed. This demo [4] is what I consider abuse of CSS3 animation with element() but if done sanely, certain things are possible if done with this approach. Alan 1. <http://css-class.com/test/css/3/image/element-gradient-rotate-animation1.htm> 2. http://bradclicks.com/cssplay/Gradient_Tiled_BG/index.html 3. <http://css-class.com/test/css/3/image/element-stars-background-movement2.htm> 4. http://css-class.com/test/temp/transform5.htm -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Friday, 31 August 2012 10:05:53 UTC