- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:16:37 +0200
- To: "Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com" <mtanalin@yandex.ru>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
| More precisely, my proposal is not just different, it's | at least _less confusing_ and _more intuitive_ than | current CSS draft: variable name inside `@var` rule | and inside `var()` function are _identical_ and thus | totally intuitively connected with each other (that's | what current thread by Jens is about). While I don't like the idea of an 'at-rule' inside a selector for variables, I like your proposal more than the current one. The identifier used to represent custom properties should be the same in the "define" and the "use" world; this is a strong requirement I settled very quickly in the discussion and almost anybody agree with it. The current syntax doesn't comply to this elementary requirement and I would object to it if I was a CSS WG member.
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:16:48 UTC