Re: [css3-text] Better wording than "known to be language X" (was line-break questions/comments from Glenn Adams on 2012-08-29 (www-style@w3.org from August 2012)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:04:31 +0800
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, ML public-i18n-core <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dN=WgMrHO96=Df0O8revJPULGfceV-qyh261K7B8UMNA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Leif Halvard Silli <
xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote:

> Hi! If the language is unknown, then the language is unidentifiable.
>

I'm afraid I do not agree. In any case, I do not wish to propose a change
from the current language under the definition of "content language", so I
will not continue this thread further since fantasai's proposed change
addresses my concerns.

G.

Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:05:28 UTC