- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:00 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 8/28/12 6:46 AM, "Dirk Schulze" <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > >On Aug 28, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to ask to rename "SVG Shapes"[1] from CSS3 Exclusions. The >>shapes seem to be really useful, but don't have a lot in common with SVG >>anymore. Also they are more powerful then the SVG pendents. >> >> I would suggest "Basic Shapes" but even "CSS Shapes" is fine. > >The link got clipped of: > >[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/#shapes-from-svg-syntax I think they still have quite a lot in common, but there are slight differences by now. I've changed the headings to "Basic Shapes" and "Supported Shapes" and noted that the syntax is merely similar to SVG Basic Shapes. Thanks, Alan
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 21:12:42 UTC