- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:12:42 +0800
- To: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- CC: Public W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
(12/08/25 7:45), "Gérard Talbot" wrote: > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/fixed-table-layout-001x.html > > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/fixed-table-layout-001y.html > > No browser (explicit list: Firefox 14.0.1, Opera 12.0.1, Chrome > 21.0.1180.81, Konqueror 4.9.0) centers the black stripe within the blue > rectangle in both tests. I am adding IE9 and WeasyPrint to the list. (Amaya is a bit weird. It centers the black stripe in fixed-table-layout-001y but not the black stripe in fixed-table-layout-001x. I think it either doesn't support 'table-layout' or belong to the list.) > Now, if no browser use the algorithm of 10.3.3, then why should such > possibility still be mentioned/remain in section 17.5.2.1 ? > > I am for removing the whole block that starts with > "However, if the table" > to > "margin-right: 2em }" Agreed, and in fact no known implementation, browsers or non-browsers, utilizes this possibility. Also, I have no idea why this paragraph singles out tables in normal flow instead of just applying 10.3 in general (for abs-pos and floated tables). Does anyone know the history here? Cheers, Kenny -- Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 07:13:21 UTC