- From: Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org, public-device-apis@w3.org, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Dzung D Tran <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
Thanks Marcos. The raw data from that doc file: http://pastebin.com/n8LvVC1D The data in this report is not consistent with what Tab or I reported wrt the Galaxy Nexus. F.E., putting a flashlight 1 inch from the sensor only generated what this report terms "Cloudy Outdoors". Maybe this is just a bad sensor in this device, or something else we are not considering. Doug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> To: "Doug Turner" <dougt@mozilla.com> Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org, public-device-apis@w3.org, "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "Dzung D Tran" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 6:55:24 PM Subject: Re: Next step for DAP Ambient Light Events On Monday, 27 August 2012 at 22:00, Doug Turner wrote: > I am getting different results on the Galaxy Nexus (ICS). Close to double what Tab saw. > > ~380 LUX in the office type lighting. > ~28000 LUX in very bright light. > The following paper by Microsoft might be useful (page 13 contains a table of how Lux values map to different lighting conditions): http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/gg463478.aspx Though I don't think the paper above cites any sources. I also had little luck in google scholar trying to find a scientific study (though I might just have been looking for the wrong terms)… other sources that present similar tables I found: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lux http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/light-level-rooms-d_708.html The wikipedia article actually cites sources, but I've not checked their validity in any detail. Hope that helps! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com (mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com)> > To: "Dzung D Tran" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com (mailto:dzung.d.tran@intel.com)> > Cc: "Doug Turner" <dougt@mozilla.com (mailto:dougt@mozilla.com)>, www-style@w3.org (mailto:www-style@w3.org), public-device-apis@w3.org (mailto:public-device-apis@w3.org), "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com (mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com)> > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 11:20:27 AM > Subject: Re: Next step for DAP Ambient Light Events > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Tran, Dzung D <dzung.d.tran@intel.com (mailto:dzung.d.tran@intel.com)> wrote: > > A quick un-scientific test: > > > > Nexus 7 tablet (JB) Galaxy Nexus Phone (ICS) Xolo Phone (ICS) > > > > Office lighting: ~550 lux ~170 ~700 > > > > Flash light (1"): ~40,000 ~12000 ~48,000 > > Interesting. I'd like to see a few more results, to see if the Galaxy > Nexus is just an outlier, or if things are generally that spread out. > > If they turn out to be that spread out, though, then I recommend > defining the named light levels not in absolute lux values, but > instead just defining them generally and noting that devices should > map their lux ranges as appropriate (with a note that this lack of > definition is due to the significant divergence in detected lux across > devices). > > ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 02:09:54 UTC