- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:47:57 +0000
- To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- CC: "www-style@gtalbot.org" <www-style@gtalbot.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>, ML publc-i18n-bidi <public-i18n-bidi@w3.org>
[rocallahan@gmail.com] >For scrollLeft, Sylvain wants IE's behavior, >Glenn and Shane want the Firefox/Opera/Webkit(viewport) behavior (matching pageXOffset). Shane thought IE9 had it right but was OK with your bogus-data-based proposal so I don't think it's so clear cut :) Given the divergence in implementations it seems we can change this one way or the other. However, I'd rather not make this kind of change in a piecemeal fashion. I would rather see a proposal describing what RTL does to CSSOM-View properties overall. It may be that these properties are all physical and are unaffected, or they're logical, or we'll add an extra set of logical properties and make the current ones physical...Whatever the solution it just seems an area where we should make one set of carefully considered changes across all our implementations. I don't mean to slow down progress on resolving this particular issue; but I've had some spectacularly bad times messing with this Jenga tower of properties in the not so distant past.
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 17:48:29 UTC