- From: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:32:54 +0300
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > The spec is completely clear. The behavior exhibited by the browsers > is a bug. However, it's also a completely unimportant bug that no one > will ever run into unless they are specifically trying to test for it, > or they're doing something *really* messed up with automated selector > generation. I would be completely fine with declaring any bugs filed > against WebKit about this as WONTFIX, because doing it "right" will > likely slow down selector matching (by making specificity sorting > slower) by an appreciable amount. However, this means that we know there are not two interoperable implementations of this part of CSS 4 Selectors, so it shouldn't be able to progress to PR. Since browsers all behave the same, it makes the most sense to just spec what browsers do, and add a test. I don't see any justification for keeping the spec as-is except if you think that the spec should be theoretically pure rather than matching implementations.
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 13:34:04 UTC