Hi, Selectors specificity is calculated from three integers a, b and c and: > Concatenating the three numbers a-b-c (in a number system with a > large base) gives the specificity. My understanding is that "a large base" means one larger than any of a, b and c. In other words, the final specificity is not a single number but a tuple of 3 integers, compared in lexicographic order. Apparently, "a large base" is 256 in Gecko and WebKit: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2809024/points-in-css-specificity/11934505#11934505 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4388649 I’m not sure about other engines. Should the spec be made more precise on this point? Is it deliberately vague to allow this kind of behavior? (Using a single int is probably more efficient.) In my opinion, the behavior in Gecko and WebKit is incorrect but the approximation is good enough. I don’t know if this makes a difference in any real stylesheet (ie. not made for the purpose of experimenting with specificity.) To keep a single integer but be more correct (IMO), implementation could also clamp b and c to a maximum like 255 rather than letting them overflow. -- Simon SapinReceived on Thursday, 16 August 2012 10:33:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:20 UTC