On 08/09/2012 07:37 AM, Alan Stearns wrote: > The fragmentation module describes how forced breaks operate in a > fragmented flow, but I do not think it makes clear what happens with > forced breaks in non-fragmented contexts. I am assuming that > break-before:page has no effect if the flow is not paginated. And that > break-before:column has no effect if the flow is not in a multi-column > element (but see below). If this is correct, this should be made explicit > in the module. > > I would like break-before:column to create a break in a single-column, > paginated flow. Pagination creates columns of text, so it makes sense to > me to honor an author's intent to place something at the top of a column > by placing it at the top of a page. I know this suggestion was not > well-received the last time I brought this up, but I'm still unclear on > why. Added as an issue to the spec, along with the following proposed wording: | When a forced break occurs, it forces ensuing content into the next | fragmenter of the type associated with the break, breaking through | as many fragmentation contexts as necessary until the specified break | types are all satisfied. If the document is not fragmented (e.g. in | continous media when no fragmenting features such as multi-column | layout are used), then the forced break has no effect. Think about that, and let me know if that's what we want. Alternatively I can just define column breaks to be promoted to page breaks when there is no ancestor multicol context. ~fantasaiReceived on Monday, 13 August 2012 01:07:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:20 UTC