Re: Path to polyfilling CSS functions?

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Boris Smus <smus@google.com> wrote:
> The problem with the var approach is that it's not a future-proof solution.
> Once a site is deployed with var- or x- prefixed properties, it's quite
> unlikely that it'll ever be updated (cf. stickiness of -webkit-transform).

If these properties are implemented by author polyfill rather than
browsers, it wouldn't need to be updated, since other/future browsers
would be able to execute the polyfill?

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis