- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 00:45:17 +0200
- To: Michel Onoff <michel.onoff@web.de>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Michel Onoff wrote: > You're writing a paper on computer science. For illustrative purposes, > you include short code snippets. > > Since they are short and since you don't want the reader to be > distracted by back and forth page flipping to grasp the code, you > disallow page breaks inside the snippets. > > On the other hand, you don't want to waste precious space either. You > are prepared for the snippets to be taken out of the normal flow and > floated on the top of the next page, but only if on the current page > there's no sufficient room in the natural position in the flow. > > You only care that your snippets' listings are visually rendered as a > whole. You prefer positioning inside the normal flow if there's > sufficient room. Otherwise, you accept an out of flow positioning, on > the next page. Of course, you are prepared for forced breaks if the > snippets are longer than a page. > > There are CSS working drafts about: > > * "CSS Paged Media Module Level 3" (http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/) > * "CSS Generated Content for Paged Media Module" > (http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/) > > There are new float properties and controls for page breaks but they do > not seem to solve the problem above, not even when combined. Floats are > unconditional and avoiding page breaks wastes space. > > Are there plans to add "conditional" floats to the mentioned specifications? The proposed "snap" keyword is close to what you are asking for: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/#page-and-column-floats You can e.g. set: pre.code { float: snap; } That is, the code will float to the top of the next page if there isn't room. If there is room, it will stay in its natual position -- unless the natural position is close to page breaks, in which case the element will snap to the the top or bottom. In a the WD, there's a more explicit keyword "unless-room": http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-gcpm/#float-modifiers But I think the "snap" value is better and it should cover more cases. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 22:45:54 UTC